I'm looking for guidance on protecting a bag house/dust collector at a sawmill facility.
The unit comes with outlets attached for nozzles/sprinklers. Some of the existing ones at the facility are protected with anit-freeze systems, some with dry systems. Is there a reason you would need to use anti-freeze in lieu of a dry system for this application? Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Glenn Berger
12/29/2020 09:12:30 am
Today's recommendation would be to use a dry-pipe system due to the issues that have risen with improper mixing of antifreeze systems.
Reply
Tyler Blume
12/29/2020 09:20:24 am
I have used heat trace to protect the pipe.
Reply
Franck
12/29/2020 09:29:39 am
The use of antifreeze was probably dictated for cost reasons.
Reply
Mark Harris
12/29/2020 06:59:54 pm
As Franck notes no reason you can.t do multiple dust collectors off a common dry valve and makes sense cost wise if the dust collectors are close together (but all collectors will be off one flow alarm). Rules for antifreeze have changed over the years and a expansion tank and RP backflow preventer along with maintenance issues may make the dry valve attractive.. May be able to supply dry pipe valve with plant air and listed air maintenance device.
Reply
Brian Spurrell
1/5/2021 06:55:44 am
Located in Eastern Canada, have always used dry system.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop November '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2024
PE PREP SERIES |