MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Maximum and Minimum Pressures for FDC Sign?

3/18/2022

14 Comments

 
We have been asked to supply FDC signage for an existing building with combined sprinkler/standpipe system.

The AHJ has requested that both minimum and maximum operating pressure be included on the sign.

Can we use existing hydraulic data information or should it be recalculated including friction loss from the fire hose to pumper truck?

Also, what would constitute the maximum pressure in a combined sprinkler / Class III system?

Would it be max 175 psi at all 2-1/2” hose connections if there are pressure regulations devices on the 1-1/2” hose valves?

Thanks in advance in helping us sort this out.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
14 Comments
Derek
3/18/2022 08:06:34 am

I have never heard of an AHJ requesting this....FFs are taught across the board to pump into FDC's at 150psi. I imagine using the existing hydraulic information would be sufficient. Good luck!

Reply
Anthony
3/18/2022 08:19:10 am

If its a manual system the minimum should be 150 psi at 1000 gpm per NFPA 14 - 2016 A.7.10.1.2

With out extensive examination the the components attached to the system I'd keep the maximum to 175 psi as that is the most common maximum psi rating for fire protection system parts. Its also the maximum static allowable on hose valves without pressure regulating/reducing devices.

The AHJ (local fire marshal) would know better what the local response teams can handle and train with. They may want a lower pressure as high pressure hoses can get dangerous.


If its automatic I'd look at the fire pump test report and match the rated combined flow for the minimum with a maximum at the churn+city water supply would be.

Reply
Alex
3/18/2022 08:23:31 am

Hi,

Rerunning the calculations depend on what you have modeled/calculated currently. If you have a standpipe calc with your FDC located adjacent to the pump, then I would say you're okay without running an additional calc. Although, if you have a longer run from your FDC, I would highly recommend running another. In the end, running a calculation does not hurt and is always the best approach.

NFPA 14 (2016) 7.8.1.2 states "manual standpipe systems shall be designed to provide 100 psi at the topmost outlet with the calculations terminating at the fire department connection". This will be used to help determine your minimum pressure. Note: you do not calculate the pressure loss from the FDC to the pumper.

For your maximum pressure, NFPA 14 (2016) 7.2.1 states "the maximum pressure at any point in the system at any time shall not exceed 350 PSI". You can use this value at the base of your standpipe to calculate the maximum pressure allowed by the fire department.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Alex
3/18/2022 08:25:06 am

Clarification on the 350 PSI. This value requires PRVs off of the standpipe contingent on elevation loss. Ensure you review the entire system before providing the maximum pressure.

Alex

Reply
Dan Wilder
3/18/2022 08:28:45 am

The signage should be the requirement at the FDC inlet only. Let the Truck Engineer do the math on losses for the connections between the truck and the FDC (could be a run 2-2.5"x50' hoses or 1-4"x50' to a wye and 2-2.5"x50' hoses depending on how far away they park or available hoses). They have the potential of pumping far greater than 175PSI into a system.

The minimum pressure (required pressure) should be based on calculations for the standpipe system (most cases the more demanding)...as for a maximum, that is subjective in my eyes. Are there any other examples in the jurisdiction you can reference? I would stay clear of providing a maximum, this is an operations training item with the crews and is subject to interpretation across installation companies.

Reply
Alex
3/18/2022 08:43:24 am

Hi Dan,

I've never seen a maximum either but the idea of one sounds useful. For instance, in my small town I have a few small (under 3 story) buildings equipped with a sprinkler system. It could be "easy" for our truck to exceed 175 psi and begin to risk damaging the system.

To me, providing the maximum pressure is a way for the engineers to provide more guidance on the system. Curious on where this question arose!

Alex

Reply
DW
3/18/2022 08:45:08 am

I believe the AHJ is after the sign required by NFPA 13 2016 8.17.2.4.7.2. However it is probable that they are mistaken on the need, and proper use of the sign like our local AHJ's who often require this. The sign is required on systems that have a demand greater than 150 PSI. If the original calculation data is available, I would say that is safe to use, since the system was designed to that data, and the original sign (if needed) would have been off of that information also. Essentially when our AHJ's require this they are looking for what the inlet pressure should be at the FDC when the pressure is greater then the normal 150 psi starting pressure. I'm not sure what the minimum operating pressure they are looking for could be, and it is the fire department responsibility to calculate friction loss to the FDC. With the various types of FDC's, size fire hoses, and lengths of hose, it would be difficult to calculate the friction loss from the pumper to the FDC unless the fire department was very involved in the process.

Reply
Jesse
3/18/2022 08:52:26 am

We do this a lot.

The standpipes are calc'd at 250-gpm @ 100-psi with the number of outlets flowing (calc'd) determined in 14.

Most of our AHJs have an SOP for the pump operator to set the discharge pressure at 155-psi. The agency I was at did 160. For anything above that, they require signage.

For example my last one, the standpipe test showed we had to set the pump pressure at 170. They required a sign at the FDC saying "PUMP TO 175 PSI"

Reply
Franck
3/18/2022 09:14:41 am

- Personnel opinion -
To my point of view (but maybe asking what the AHJ has in mind would be better - communication is a key element to avoid mistakes and misunderstandings).
- the minimum requirements to be indicated is the sprinkler demand of the most demanding area (flow and pressure)
- The maximum to be indicated is 175 psi as sprinkler systems should not operate above that pressure. No need to indicate a flow as the 175 psi is the maximum value, with or without flow.

Reply
Emil Ohler
3/18/2022 10:01:27 am

Maybe the signs they are looking for are as per NFPA 14 6.8 Hydraulic design info

Reply
Original Poster
3/18/2022 02:58:58 pm

Wow! Thanks for all the great replies. I agree the AHJ in this case might not be aware of the 150 psi clause as per NFPA 14.

I did the calc’ and came up with minimum 110 psi at 500 gpm as per the local building code for this area. (65psi at most remote FHC). Then used 175 psi as the max for sprinkler components and 2 1/2” Hose Valves.

After that I thought why not check out the surrounding area? The building next door had signage indicating Minimum 90 psi / Maximum 175 psi, so I believe we are on the right track.

Thanks for all the great posts! 👍

Reply
Pete D.
3/18/2022 04:53:31 pm

It completely depends on the situation. What if your building is 50 stories 15 ft. elevation each? If the fire is in the penthouse, 175 psi will get the water a little more than halfway there.

Reply
Original Poster
3/18/2022 04:58:38 pm

Agree. If it was a high building there would likely be pressure reducing valves on the sprinkler zones and pressure restricting hose valves on the lower floors to accommodate a higher maximum pressure. In this case we had a 5 story building.

AJ
4/13/2022 10:39:44 pm

From a firefighter's perspective, we want to be prepared for the unexpected while maintaining simple, consistent procedures throughout the membership. Before I explain, a few bullet points:

Task: Supply the fire attack with more than enough pressure.
- Nozzle 185gpm @ 50 psi
- 200' of 1.75" hose (FL = 30 psi per 100')
- Minimum 110 psi
- Fire Attack controls the discharge pressure at the standpipe connection with a 2.5" gate valve that we put on.
- 5 psi per floor for the total number of floors in the building.

FDC Pump Discharge Pressure:
1-5 Floors = 175 psi
6-10 Floors = 200 psi
11-15 Floors = 225 psi
>16 Floors = 175 psi + 5 psi for every floor
Add supply hose FL to get final pressure.

Example #1
7 Story Apartment = 210 psi
200 psi + 10 psi for supply FL

Example #2
23 Story High Rise = 300 psi
175 psi + 115 psi for Elevation + 10 psi Supply

Love to hear what you guys think.
Any questions please ask.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Feb '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT