|
I represent an AHJ in Massachusetts and have a potential tenant who reached out to my office about what sprinkler work might need to be done during an upfit, I don't have all the information on their plans or level of alterations.
My question includes MA 780 CMR (Mass building code) and MGL 148 S26G (sprinklers in buildings over 7500 sqft). The building is all business occupancies and is a 1892 build with 12,952 sqft. No current fire protection in the building. The size brings into question 148 S26G, my question is would a level 2 alteration or level 3 alteration trigger 26g as "major renovation" and trigger the entire building needing sprinklers? The shop in question might only account for 10% of the square footage, so would that be major in the context of the building? If that doesn't trigger it, would the level 2 or 3 for B use group in the retail space that is smaller than 12,000 sqft itself, but part of a building that is 12,000+ trigger sprinklers in the renovated space? Thanks for your insights. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Respectful Opinion
4/16/2026 08:29:55 am
Tell them to hire an architect (let's assume qualified, competent, licensed, insured), have the architect complete a code analysis for the client, and then they can propose their interpretation of the codes/standards to the AHJ for approval. This doesn't seem like the type of thing that the AHJ should be deciding for a tenant unless you're going to accept the downstream implications (cost/time/liability) of the consultation you're providing.
Reply
OP
4/16/2026 03:11:41 pm
The asking party has not rented the space yet and called first to the AHJ with the question. They were informed they would need a registered design professional to create and submit plans that were code compliant, but with the question being asked I wanted to educate myself on it and be better prepared for if/when they submit plans.
Reply
MO
4/16/2026 08:48:40 am
I haven’t worked in Mass so I can’t speak to their local laws, so I’ll focus on the last question of the post.
Reply
OP
4/16/2026 03:16:49 pm
Thanks MO, the space does not share corridors and doesn't meet the occupant load requirements set out in 803.2.2. Also the clarity I was looking for was building area vs tenant area which you touch on and answers my question about that. appreciate it
Reply
MO
4/16/2026 09:07:04 am
Edit: Meant to include EBC 604.1 for Alt 3 definition.
Reply
danefre
4/17/2026 11:50:44 am
I work in MA.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop July '26 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
September 2026
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
