MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Hydrant Spacing & Location for Industrial Plant?

6/20/2025

11 Comments

 
For a newly built steel smelting plant, how should the layout spacing and protection range of private fire hydrants be considered?

I have checked that NFPA 1 states the maximum spacing for "Buildings Other than Detached One- and Two-Family Dwellings" is no more than 500 feet, but NFPA 850 specifies a maximum spacing of 300 feet.

Do both govern?

If so, does the more-restrictive one apply?

What should be the protection range of each hydrant?

Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Pete H
6/20/2025 07:56:11 am

When two codes are in conflict, the more restrictive one generally applies.

Reply
Glenn Berger
6/20/2025 08:17:22 am

You need to identify which codes and standards apply your project. I would not expect NFPA 850 to be applicable.

Reply
Dan Wilder
6/20/2025 08:30:13 am

NFPA 850 is currently a "Recommend Practice" (moving to a standard for 2026) which is less than a "Standard" and 3rd in line from NFPA 1 "Code".

850 will contain a lot of "Should" statements and also has the inclusion of a FPDBD - Fire Protection Design Basis Document - which can address this discrepancy within that report. As an order of operations, NFPA 1 (and AHJ approvals) would be the guiding document however the differing distances should be noted for review.


**As a voting member of NFPA 850, my statements above are my opinion and have not been processed in accordance with Section 6 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards and shall not be considered the official position of NFPA or any of its Committees and shall not be considered to be, nor be relied upon as, a Formal Interpretation.

Reply
Ricardo Gonzales Jr
6/20/2025 08:55:57 am

Is NFPA 1 & 5000 adopted or are the I-Codes adopted? Other NFPA documents are standards in which can be used as a best practice approach.

The IFC provides guidance in Section 507 and if Appendix C is included in that adoption provides the minimum quantity of hydrants.

There are also other restrictions if standpipes are in the design.

Reply
Sanjeev
6/20/2025 08:58:12 am

You apply NFPA 850 as it is applicable for industrial plant. We use the same in our industrial project.

Reply
Jesse
6/20/2025 09:00:47 am

I'm with Dan re: 850. But that's not one of my committees so I don't need to use that disclaimer - but I'm gonna steal and use it in the future!

So NFPA 1 is going to govern on the NFPA side of things. But, IBC gets a vote and your AHJ may have amended it further than what the IBC text says.

I do a lot of underground fire line design work, and my default to this is work with the AHJ. Ask what they want.

Reply
CONNOR R
6/20/2025 09:28:33 am

NFPA 850 is the Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current Converter Stations. The scope of NFPA 850 does not directly include steel smelting plants:

1.1 Scope.
This document provides recommendations for fire prevention and fire protection for electric generating plants and high voltage direct current converter stations, except as follows: Advanced light water reactor electric generating plants are addressed in NFPA 804; nuclear power plants are addressed in NFPA 805; and fuel cells are addressed in NFPA 853.

I know that steel mills often have onsite power generation, so NFPA 850 may be applicable to a portion of the facility but would not apply to the whole plant. Consider spacing at 300 ft around the generation facility and 500 ft everywhere else.

Reply
Franck
6/20/2025 01:13:12 pm

You should definitely ask the AHJ and to a certain extent the Insurance Company as well.
In my previous insurance company we were asking a maximum spacing of 250 ft for industrial facilities (and we were insuring many steel mills worldwide).

NFPA 850 might not be the most appropriate standard for steel mills (even though it provides excellent recommendations for large transformers, cable spreading rooms, turbines, and other facilities and equipment found at steel mills, including guidelines for coke storage and transportation that is often used at steel mills (depending on the process on site)).

Reply
Jack G
6/20/2025 02:56:08 pm

NFPA 850.
However I would consult the AHJ before installing.
Also use some common sense for locations and maybe additional hydrants to simplify .

Reply
Nimal Tissa Wijetunga
6/21/2025 08:40:27 pm

Please refer NFPA 24 if the system is external hydrant points of 21/2"inch in size.

Reply
Johannes
6/23/2025 12:24:57 am

Another aspect I would take into account, should be: What is your standard hose length? On ships and offshore structures, it is required to reach any point of the vessel with two jets of water, each supplied from different hydrants, where one nozzle must be connected via only one hose and the second nozzle maybe connected via two.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Feb '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT