MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Test a Pump with Throttling Governor?

9/23/2022

10 Comments

 
What is the best procedure to use when testing a 3,500 gallon diesel fire pump that is equipped with a throttling/pressure governor installed on it?

My graph was well below the rated curve at 50% and 100%, but the governor seemed to disengage at 150% flow and my numbers exceeded the rated curve when we pushed this much water.

I did not attempt to change the controller settings or unplug the device (if that's even possible) to disengage the forced idle at 50% or 100% but insurance isn't "buying" that the pump didn't fail. These pumps aren't more than 5 years old and are ran on a tight schedule once a week (by the way).

Maintenance thinks it'll lead to faster wear and tear on the motor and I agree. All I could really do was state the facts and hope I don't have to go back out there and do the test again.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
schulman
9/23/2022 08:32:37 am

you are allowed some "droop" 10% ..speed loss from churn to 150% per NFPA 11.2.4.1.1 (2016)

but also 14.2.6.5.7.3 .. governor must be set at time of test (by you or manufacturer of motor) to test pump at rated pump speed

Reply
Bobby Suarez
9/23/2022 09:23:19 am

If I understand your question correctly you are referring to a Variable Speed Fire Pump. Both NFPA 20 and 25 outline the performance requirements and testing procedures for Variable Speed Pumps. Amongst the other difference between these and standard fire pumps; variable speed pumps use a 5 point performance test instead of the typical 3 point test.

Reply
Chris link
9/12/2023 01:59:54 pm

It is not a vfd it is a pld. Variable frequency drives or VFDs are used on electric fire pumps. Pressure limiting device or PLDs are used on diesel fire pumps.
CJG

Reply
Jesse
9/23/2022 10:06:18 am

I have no doubt the insurer's Loss Control engineer as well as their VP of engineering rates it having failed.

I'm presuming this is a variable speed pump. If you're using the same 3 point performance test as you would for a standard drive fire pump instead of the 5 point you might not be collecting enough data to begin with.

Your pumps aren't very old. But I've seen younger pumps fail.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
9/23/2022 11:06:57 am

I wasn't aware you could use a VFD controller on a diesel fire pump. That's a new one on me if that's the case but we don't see a lot of VFDs anyway. If the pump didn't hit within 10% of its rating at 100%, then it should be failed. Definitely don't adjust anything yourself without direct instructions from owner or owners rep to do so. If you aren't familiar with the device, I would advise calling in the commissioning pump rep to come in that did it originally. Charge the customer for their time on site. It's possible that it is being throttled to prevent over pressurization of certain equipment and they are "flattening" the curve. If so, and hydraulic calcs are based on that, then I would advise a permanent sign be installed that says "Pump designed to provide combined X psi at 50% and combined X psi at 100%".

Reply
Franck
9/23/2022 12:20:53 pm

Working for an insurance company, I can tell you we don’t like variable speed pumps because of reliability. If the system fails, the pump willl not work properly.
This being said, you can anyway test the pump and compare the results to expected ones from a “normal” pump by adjusting the results to the nominal speed of the pump. So I hope you measured the rotational speed for all measured points.

Reply
John
9/23/2022 05:15:11 pm

Thanks for all the input. I spoke with 2 different manufacturer representatives and they both said the test needs to be done at constant speed, but one did say the I could try and present the Affinity Law and show them that churn was at 94% on one and 96% on the other. I sent them the calculations and I think the "smoke and mirrors" worked. I did see that NFPA 25 (2020) has the new items for the multiple test points and even says to do it at variable and constant speed unless the controller and pump manufacturer states different.

Reply
Thomas Duross
9/24/2022 04:52:37 am

You can either adjust flow and pressure by using affinity laws or disable the PLD and run full speed. You might have to close the system supply and the relief too.

Reply
Mark
9/25/2022 08:28:06 pm

Did Insurance Company or you have access to the original acceptance tests and three prior annual tests to compare?

Reply
Bill
3/13/2023 05:40:12 pm

The PLD adjusts for pressure so you'll never know the pump is not running right unless you do a 3 point test with the PLD disconnected. Of course this will always run pressures >175 psi so the discharge valve to UG & risers needs to be shut and the PRV needs to be adjusted closed to get accurate test results on the pump performance itself.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT