MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Calculate OH Room in Light Hazard Area?

5/3/2021

4 Comments

 
When you have a common office building that is classified as a Light Hazard but you have some rooms that may be Ordinary Hazard such as storage rooms and others.

When you have your layout and one or more of these rooms ends up in your design area, how do you proceed in the calculation?

1.- Do you calculate 0.10 gpm/sqft over 1,500 sqft?

2.- Do you calculate according to Chapter 23 Sections 23.4.4.2.4 and 23.4.4.2.5 specifically for that room even if it is one or two sprinklers?

3.- Do you calculate everything with the density and area for the hazard of that room even though everything else is Light Hazard?

4.- Do you calculate 0.10 gpm/sqft over 1,500 sqft and ensure that the sprinklers inside the room discharge at the minimum density for the hazard they have?

This may be very general and definitely every project is different but every time I run into this I have this same question. I was told to just calculate everything as a Light Hazard but my curiosity always keeps me thinking about it.

Moderator Note: This question is different, but similar to: www.meyerfire.com/daily/ordinary-hazard-within-light-hazard-building

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Matt
5/3/2021 08:08:01 am

If a sprinkler in your design area falls within an OH room or space, simply calculate those affected sprinklers at the revised density (0.20 gpm/sqft).

Reply
James
5/3/2021 08:28:21 am

Right, I'm with Matt. Option #4 with a caveat:

One important clarification - "buildings" are not classified as a hazard, "areas" are. A building can include a collection and mixture of Light, Ordinary, Extra Hazard, etc. NFPA 13-2019 Handbook "Designer's Corner" 4.3.1.3 backs this up.

In this case, calculate the portions of the remote area which is considered Ordinary Hazard with its appropriate density, such as 0.15 gpm/sqft or 0.20 gpm/sqft. If the two hazards have no barrier in-between, then extend the higher-hazard by a minimum of 15-feet into the lower hazard area, offset ceilings, or provide a draft curtain, per NFPA 13-2019 Section 19.2.2.

Reply
Franck
5/3/2021 08:42:03 am

Much as been said at: www.meyerfire.com/daily/ordinary-hazard-within-light-hazard-building

As a practical approach:

1. If the area is small (1-2 heads) and is not located in the most remote area of the system, I would just design the sprinkler protection in the room with the spacing limitations for sprinklers for OH (or EH) and the pipe sizing accoring to the pipe schedule method (for EH, you have it on the Annex section of NFPA 13).
Regarding the water supply sizing (as the duration and densities are slightly higher for this room than the rest of the building), I would not worry that much (if the room is not in the most remote area, the additional demand for water/pressure will be compensated by the friction losses to reach the most remote area that has been calculated).

2. If the area is located in the most remote area, I would design the sprinklers in the room as above in 1. (for spacing, pipe sizing...), and make my hydraulic calculation with the correct pressure at the sprinkler to have the required density in the OH/EH room (which should be a higher pressure, i.e. a higher flow, for these sprinklers) and as a light hazard for the remaining of the remote area (note that if some heads in the LH area are located on the same pipe feeding the OH area, these heads would result in a much higher flow - this will not be the case if you feed your OH/EH area directly from the cross main).
Regarding the sizing of the water supply, the hydraulic calculation will determine how much additional water you need for that area. The difference in the duration (for a small room) should not have a large impact (could be considered as negligible) on the final volume.

3. If the room is not in the most remote area and is quite large (or if multiple rooms are located within a same area of 1500 sq ft), I would make 2 hydraulic calculations. One for the most remote area (which could be LH only) and one for this area (as per point 2 above), just to be sure. But only if I have a doubt that the room may be large enough to have a negative impact on the final results.

Reply
Dan Wilder
5/3/2021 10:54:27 am

Big reason why there needs to be a push for a distinction between "Hydraulically Remote Design Area" vs. "Remote Area". I'm with the #4 option as well and Franck sums it up well.

As the overall building occupancy and the room names determine what occupancy we would design to, there is still the determination that what is physically remote vs what is hydraulically remote that needs to be accounted for.

Small ancillary rooms within the remote area (especially when there is no wall rated separation) just need to be verified that the sprinkler(s) protecting that room are both spaced and are being provided with the correct (or minimum) flow & pressure for the hazard but should not change an overall design area approach (small storage rooms within an office area as an example).

However, if a larger, higher hazard room (still within the applicable building code allowances) is not within the initially physically remote area, an internal "check calc" would be a preferred first step to verify it is not the hydraulically remote system. Best example I can think of would be a science lab within a school building (we approach this room as being ordinary hazard as many AHJ's have redlined our submittals) or a larger IT/server room within an office building.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT