What is the correct way to fill a "Hydraulic Design Information sign" when using a "CMSA" approach?
For CMSA we do not have a typical design area and instead we are working for number of sprinklers and minimum pressure. The placards typically call for design area, density, etc. Thanks in advance for the input. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Pete H
6/25/2024 07:40:24 am
For a sample, this is a basic calc of 15 16.8k upright CMSA heads on a ceiling only system as per Table 17.2.2.1 (NFPA 13 2016 ed.)
Reply
Glenn Berger
6/25/2024 08:09:45 am
Agree with Chris - I would just have said - mark all information that went into the design from the hydraulic calculations with a permanent label maker.
Reply
Jesse
6/25/2024 08:14:35 am
I do CMSA the same way I do ESFR. Basically something akin to 12 K=16.8 ESFR @ 52 psi in the design info
Reply
Dan Wilder
6/25/2024 08:21:26 am
As we don't have a separate calc plate for CMSA, ESFR, or standpipes I typically do the following:
Reply
Daniel Bobadilla
6/25/2024 09:51:39 am
CMSA and ESFR systems hydraulic calculations don't require a density and design area. Just include the number of sprinklers calculated (usually 12 for ESFR) and sprinkler pressure required according to NFPA 13 or the sprinkler listing, add the hose flow, and the required flow and pressure in the base of the riser.
Reply
Jack G
6/25/2024 10:08:27 am
Agree.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop December '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
January 2025
PE PREP SERIES |