MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Flow Switch on Discharge Side of Fire Pump?

12/9/2024

20 Comments

 
Is a flow switch required on the discharge side of the fire pump on the pipe before it exits the pump room?

We have an approved job that does not have a flow switch, and the fire marshal is requiring one.

​Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
20 Comments
Pete H
12/9/2024 06:42:00 am

My immediate questions:

1) Is this pump fed from a tank?
2) Is this a displacement pump?
3) Are there separate isolated alarm/control valve system risers in the pump room downstream of the fire pump?

If a yes to the first two, it might need to be a full flow meter as opposed to just a flow detector.

If yes to the third.... yes, put a flow switch on each riser.

I can be wrong.

Reply
Glenn Berger
12/9/2024 08:09:39 am

My questions will be:

How far is the fire pump from the suppression system distribution?

Are you feeding standpipes and sprinklers?

Is there a flow switch present downstream?

Reply
Casey Milhorn
12/9/2024 09:08:04 am

I believe NFPA 14 now requires this if you have standpipes/hose valves. From a practical perspective, 100% of the time provide a flow switch. I've heard too many stories about hose valves being opened up and/or leaks occurring and flooding stairwells, basements, and/or adjacent properties. If you are a contractor, I would go through the RFI process though if it isn't contractually required by the standard or design intent drawings/specs.
Also, you should be able to program the panel to report a "feed main" or "hose valve" signal when only that flow switch is triggered, if this switch AND a sprinkler zone flow switch is signaled, just report the zone that is flowing. Not an alarm guy, but I'm fairly confident we have made this happen before.

Reply
Franck
12/9/2024 09:08:35 am

The technical answer is no.
When the pump starts (and deliver flow), you already have an alarm. Why asking for a second one ?
But you need flow switches for the different systems downstream (hoses, sprinkler risers) to know where you are delivering the water.

Reply
Anthony
12/9/2024 09:13:31 am

From a practical sense if the fire marshal is requiring it just install it that's not a fight worth fighting.

Code wise NFPA 20 doesn't seem to require it. how ever NFAP 14 specifically the diagrams on A71.(a), (b) and (c) do show a flow switch a pressure gauge after the pump assembly. So depending on the application that may be where the requirement is coming from?

Reply
Dan Wilder
12/9/2024 09:58:10 am

I will disagree with this method of thinking all day. Is it a hill I'm dying on, maybe-maybe not but it will always be under protest with the GC & owner involved so I have a means to recoup costs.

The purview of any given AHJ is based in either legislated & adopted building codes (IBC/IFC/NFPA) and referenced standards or published risk mitigation (FM Global, UFC). There is little allowance for a code official to require something without one of those two items above to reference back to as justification.

In simply complying with what an official feels or thinks opens up a checkbook that no contractor wants to fund. "Just adding the flow switch" would require a system shutdown (fire watch), materials and labor for the install, Fire Alarm wiring/programming/testing, and now an additional ITM aspect for the owner.

Reply
Jesse
12/9/2024 11:42:02 am

I agree with Dan here. I'm never afraid to question the fire marshal and stand up for my position. I was one for a long time so I kind of have an inside track.

I have never, ever lost a fire code appeal. But that that is because I pick my battles very carefully.

Dewayne Martinez
12/11/2024 07:57:22 am

I agree with Dan also. We have quite a few AHJ's that request some "wild things" during inspections. We politefully ask that they send us their requests in writing with the specific code reference so that we can send it along to the GC/Owner. Most of the times the issue just dies there.

Anthony
12/12/2024 03:40:24 pm

Dan, you're right, I'm wrong or at least I'm narrow in my view. I'm looking at this question as a design reviewer/engineer not as contractor or GC. I 100% agree if this is a post instillation comment then I'd fight it too.

Ray J link
12/9/2024 09:41:11 am

It's easier and less expensive to just state your case to the AHJ, (Authority Having Jurisdiction), and then do whatever they wish. You have to have the knowledge and street smarts to know when to go with the flow and when to fight, so to speak.

Reply
Jack G
12/9/2024 09:52:43 am

I agree with Anthony on this one.
Also its not a fight worth fighting.
There is a pump run in the panel so im curious why anyone wants a flow switch.
But its a combined system and as the individual zones and risers have alarms why shouldnt the combined system have a flow switch alarm like the sketch in nfpa.

Reply
Jose R Figueroa
12/9/2024 10:31:22 am

Assuming the Fire Pump system is installed in accordance with FM DS3-7 or NFPA 20 (supporting standpipes, hydrants, fire hose stations, and sprinkler systems), the response to the query is NO.

The pressure switches for both the jockey pump and the fire pump are typically located in the <FM> or UL Fire Pump Controller.

I appreciate the guidance from the Fire Marshall, and I would like to understand the reasoning behind the request for a water flow switch on either the suction or discharge sides of the pump. It seems that installing a flow switch at the Base of Riser (BoR) of a sprinkler system would detect flow and send an alarm more quickly than a switch installed downstream.

Could you please clarify the reasoning for this request? Thank you!

Reply
Jack G
12/9/2024 10:39:32 am

I think the intent…..is to install an alarm “ on the system”. The system being “ the combined standpipe/ sprinkler system”.
I m not sure that’s what he was going for, but shouldn’t be a big deal.
If you decide to do it be careful. Install it “after the junction of the bypass and pump discharge “ so that any flow from the bypass would be detected too.

Reply
Jose R Figueroa
12/9/2024 11:03:52 am

The alarm may not be needed in this situation and could lead to confusion. The fire pump controller is designed to automatically activate an alarm when the motor or diesel engine starts running, ensuring that any necessary action is taken promptly. Please refer to FM DS 3-7 or NFPA 20 for further guidance.

Additionally, I have observed similar issues in other countries due to misinterpretations of the referenced standards.

Reply
Jack G
12/9/2024 11:13:00 am

The text clearly shows a flow switch on the combined system. So argue the controller will signal this alarm. If the AHJ does not agree then bite the bullet and provide. The AHJ has the last word. If not shown on the contract documents ( which usually includes the clauses provide — per NFPA and AHJ ) you may be able to wiggle a change order. My opinion…..not.

Reply
Ronnie Morales
12/9/2024 11:14:22 am

Why not ask the AHJ to show you where the requirement is coming from? Then you can have a discussion if it's required or not.

Reply
Patrick Drumm
12/10/2024 07:33:46 am

I agree with Ronnie. It is always best to understand what code/section the AHJ is referencing.

One of two things will happen. You can find out that indeed, you didn't see something in the code and will gladly fix it on the current project and future projects, or the AHJ may be mistaken and you have a discussion so this does not continually come up (especially if you're in a jurisdiction you do a lot of work in).

Reply
Ronnie Morales
12/9/2024 11:35:35 am

Here is a requirement.

Stationary Fire Pumps and Standpipe Systems Handbook 2019

4.20.5.4 If a closed-type cone is used, it shall be provided with means for detecting motion of water through the cone.

Relief valve discharge is permitted to be piped back to the suction side of a fire pump (closed loop). Where this piping arrangement is used, a method to detect flow must be provided, such as a flow switch connected to a local bell, or a closed waste cone with a sight glass. This arrangement also necessitates the installation of a circulation relief valve for cooling purposes (see 4.20.7.1 for additional details). This
arrangement is shown in Exhibit I.4.28. Relief valve discharge is also permitted to be piped back to the water supply source, such as an aboveground water storage tank, as shown in Exhibit I.4.29(a). A method to detect flow is also required in this case since flow will not be readily visible, unlike cases where the relief valve discharge is piped to an open drain, as shown in Exhibit I.4.29(b).

Reply
Jose R Figueroa
12/9/2024 12:40:43 pm

This response may not align with the Fire Marshal's requirements. In confined spaces where the visibility of water flow through relief valve piping is limited, a closed-type cone or V-Cone® differential pressure (DP) meter could be more appropriate. So, this is an entirely different issue.

PS to the engineer who posed the question: please provide the specific Fire Marshal requirements. Thank you!

Reply
J.H.
12/9/2024 12:12:51 pm

What is the exact wording of the write-up from the fire marshal?

Ask the fire marshal to please provide the Code section supporting the requirement. One or both of you will learn something new.
After that, please post the outcome in this thread.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT