MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

FDC for Each Building in Private Fire Water Loop?

1/2/2026

10 Comments

 
I'm having trouble finding code citations for this, but if a single-owner site with multiple buildings (like a transportation authority property that has multiple separate buildings) has a dedicated fire water loop serving the sprinkler and hydrant water for the site, can they provide FDCs where the fire water ties into the municipal water, and not provide FDCs for the individual building sprinklers?

Or is each sprinkler system required to have its own FDC?

I would imagine that each building with a sprinkler system would still require an FDC, but I can't really find code language about this specific topic.

​Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Glenn Berger
1/2/2026 08:10:17 am

NFPA 13 "somewhat" requires one FDC for the sprinkler systems within that building. Not one FDC per sprinkler system.

The use of a single FDC for a complex may work to supply the site, but the fire department is still pulling water for their hoses downstream of this connection and will end up starving the sprinkler system of required flow.

Reply
Ivan Humberson
1/2/2026 08:12:24 am

It is standard practice to tie the FDC into the sprinkler system on the system side (downstream) of the main sprinkler shut-off valve. That way, should the main shut-off valve be closed for some reason, the fire department can still supply water to the sprinkler system. Therefore, each sprinkler system would need a separate FDC.

Reply
Chad
1/2/2026 08:39:31 am

100% this. One broken water main kills all possibility of providing water from a fire engine to ANY/ALL buildings? Unacceptable risk especially for a critical quasi public building. AHJ should be playing the AHJ card on this one.

I don’t have NFPA 1 in front of me but AHJ can compel that from chapter 1/admin rules.

Reply
Dave L.
1/2/2026 10:52:48 am

Check NFPA 13, 13, and 24 as applicable; it is very nuanced. For example, each sprinkler system (as defined in Chapter 3 of NFPA 13) is not required to have its own FDC. However, "For multiple systems the fire department connection shall be connected between the supply control valves and the system control valves," which is followed by "...shall not apply where the fire department connection is connected to the underground piping." Each configuration carries with it a varying level of risk, and this, along with access and signage should be discussed with the AHJ. I have had AHJ's allow this, and I have had AHJ's require a separate FDC for each building.

Reply
Josh
1/2/2026 08:30:57 am

Campus FDC has been commonly used on projects since I've worked on in multiple states. Some AHJs don't want them, but some do. You're going to run into semantics galore in ways only lawyerly people write when you try to nail this one down. They will hammer home the importance of accessibility, visibility and effective use, typically.

Two big items of importance I see commonly when doing these are making sure to keep control valves to a minimum, eg: don't put PIVs in each run-up to each building's riser if the FDC is upstream. Second, make sure the FDC hydrant is upstream of shutoffs also.

My experience has been that the responding FM is usually the one who will make that call on whether they like it or not.

Reply
Mark
1/2/2026 10:03:55 am

Thank you for submitting this question.
We had a similar condition.
Josh, I'm new to this industry, for "effective use", wouldn't requiring an FDC per bldg. make sense? That way, the FD would only pump the bldg that's in an event and not additional structures?

Reply
Josh
1/2/2026 11:14:46 am

Not necessarily. If you step back to a broader picture, you can see you're always robbing peter to pay paul no matter how you set it up. You can "steal" from the main in one place or you can steal from it in another place. To effectively utilize an FDC you are needing a hydrant close enough to an FDC to put a truck's pump in there nearby. Charging a loop is not uncommon.

Remember, code only says every sprinkler system must be serviceable, essentially. It seems the committee was intentionally vague here and chose not to explicitly require an FDC per building. I think it's a good choice because the committee is not who has to respond to a fire at 3 AM when it's below freezing in winter. In my opinion, each AHJ/FM is the appropriate decision-maker on how they want an FDC(s) arranged. That is the most critical component of a system and they need to have full control to utilize it the best way they can.

One last tidbit - in my city, the fire marshal does not even allow an attack truck at the building until the engine has been hooked up to the FDC. There are a lot of campus-style FDC setups here and in neighboring towns. It has to be a reasonable design with control valves deliberately placed and properly labeled/located for this to work to start with. You also cannot have disproportionate demand, etc. As is usually the case, the answer is more complex than yes/no and the whole scenario requires thinking.

Reply
Jack G
1/2/2026 11:31:45 am

Site fdc s are common. The majority of the time, there is a meter pit/ BFP pit with an fdc after the valving and on the system side water main. Also a separate fire hydrant from the supply ( before the pit valving ) off the city supply mains.
If the hose allowances are calculated properly, the individual system flow is not affected. ( I d use 500 gpm for the site fdc flow, similar to a small pump) Individual building fdc s would need hydrants near them( 100 ft ) to provide the fire department water.

Reply
Chad
1/2/2026 01:03:07 pm

The OP stated the water main that feeds the hydrants and sprinkler systems is the same. The FDC distance to hydrants/FDC is irrelevant if that main breaks. You are laying hose and might have to relay pump if distance is an issue. Same as if it was not a campus style system.

However, even if all I have is 500 gal in the tank, at least I can use that to supplement the standpipe while a water supply is established. The 2nd due engine will have another 500, we can get a knock on the fire with 1000 gallons (if not, bigger problem) That is why I would require an FDC on each building.

Reply
Jaclyn
1/5/2026 06:17:04 am

As an AHJ, we typically require a city hydrant within 200' of the FDC of each building if there is also a loop present. In the event of a fire, the city hydrant would be used to feed the FDC and the hydrants on the loop would be used for other firefighting needs. The purpose of this is to avoid depleting the sprinkler system water supply to the building.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT