MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

ESFR Sprinklers Allowed for 63-ft Ceiling, in OH2?

5/21/2026

5 Comments

 
Can ESFR sprinklers be used in a manufacturing building that is 63'-0" high to protect an Ordinary Group 2 occupancy?

NFPA 13 2022 14.2.7 allows the use of ESFR to cover OH2 and lower occupancies, but I believe that those occupancies are located in storage areas or are incidental to the storage being protected. FMDS 3-26 and 8-9 allow their use up to 100 ft, but they do not classify ESFR sprinklers the same as NFPA.

​Any thoughts?


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Pete H
5/21/2026 06:33:22 am

I think I'd say no.


From NFPA 13 (2025):

14.2.6 - occupancy and hazard. ESFR Sprinklers designed to meet any applicable ESFR criteria in Chapter 20 or Chapter 23 through 26 shall be permitted to protect light and ordinary hazard occupancies.

-

This makes me think that an AHJ could immediately say that a ceiling of that height is not covered in those chapters. And it isn't. that'd have to be an FM design if it were ESFR. I'd honestly recommend in your case trying to use Extended Coverage 25.2K Sprinklers operating at a minimum Density of 0.45 GPM/Sq. Ft based on:

From NFPA 13 (2025)

19.2.3.2.5.2 Sprinkler Density/Areas for Ceiling Heights over 30 ft.

(C) For Ordinary Hazard G2 occupancies where the ceiling height is greater than 40 feet, the ceiling sprinkler shall comply with the following:

1) Use a minimum density of 0.45 gpm/ sq ft
2) Increase the design areas obtained from table 19.2.3.1.1 by 30 percent
3) Use the design areas from 19.2.3.1.1, without a 30 percent increase, where an extended coverage sprinkler having a minimum nominal K Factor of 25.2 is used.

--

Reply
Dan Wilder
5/21/2026 07:31:39 am

In no particular order...all referencing the 2025 Edition

ESFR design is not based on CMDA criteria so interchanging the two is not allowed. This goes to the wording in 19.2.3.2.5.2 for "Sprinkler Density/Area for Ceiling Heights over 30 ft (9.1m)."

19.2.3.2.5 has a detailed chart for ceiling height, Occupancy Hazard, Sprinkler Coverage and several other criteria...none of which include an ESFR design approach.

If the original design is for ESFR criteria, the cross over is allowed. There is no path to go directly to ESFR to protect other than storage occupancies.

14.2.6 - ESFR sprinklers designed to meet any applicable ESFR criteria in Chapter 20 or Chapter 23 through Chapter 26 shall be permitted to protect light and ordinary hazard occupancies

Reply
Glenn Berger
5/21/2026 08:28:22 am

In addition to other responses - Check the manufacturer data sheet. You probably will not find many sprinklers approved for heights above 55 feet.

There may be applicable criteria for sprinklers for very tall spaces, but you need a sprinkler that can accommodate that condition.

Reply
Robert
5/21/2026 09:21:38 am

Reach out to the manufacture to clarify maximum height for the sprinkler head and request a document, if possible, for AHJ. if the design method used does not specify a maximum height the guidance to follow would be manufacture spec.

Example if a standard sprinkler head is used for light hazard per manufacture spec there is no maximum ceiling height.

Reply
anthony
5/22/2026 08:34:20 am

Short answer no. There are no ESFR sprinklers (that I know of) that are listed for over 55ft ceiling levels. others have mentioned that ESFR can protect OH2 but you run into the limitations of what an ESFR system can do.

If this is a case of applying "better" fire protection or trying to do more I would suggest against using ESFR for this. Mainly as a compliance issue.

IF there is storage in the area you'll need in rack sprinklers or a false ceiling. see chapter 25 of NFPA for ways to "raise the floor"

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 3-601-02
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT