There's a varying degree of specifications out there - but I've never really seen it openly discussed or defended.
Some organizations (such as military, many healthcare clients) require schedule 40 for pipe 1 through 2 inches in diameter. Some engineers hardly compile specifications and place no requirements on the pipe thickness. Some projects only allow schedule 40 or even schedule 80.
If you're an engineer, what is your basis for recommending different pipe thicknesses for different clients? Is corrosion the only reason why the thicker pipe diameter is specified for your clients?
Would be really interested in understanding the reasoning (one way or another) for specifying different pipe thicknesses on suppression systems. Thanks in advance.
Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
Subscribe and learn something new each day:
Thank You to Our Top
October '20 Contributors!
Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
2020 PE Prep Guide
PE Prep Series
2020 PE Prep Series
(Click to enlarge)
Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.
Solutions are posted the day after posting.
Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.
Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.