MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Egress Speed for NFPA 2001 Egress Time Study?

4/9/2025

6 Comments

 
NFPA 2001, Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems now require an egress time study to show that the design limits exposure to halocarbon agents is no longer than 5 minutes, like FK-5-1-12 (NOVEC 1230), HFC-227ea (FM 200).

This comes from 2018 Edition Section 1.5.14, 2020 Edition Section 4.3.4, and 2022 Edition Section 4.3.4.

Exposure time for inert gas agents will depend on the oxygen levels within the space or room. Concentration below 43 percent shall be permitted where exposure is no longer than 5 minutes. Concentration between 43 and 52 percent shall be permitted where exposure is no longer than 3 minutes.

The annex of NFPA 2001 tells us to review the NFPA Handbook and the SFPE Handbook for more information.

Is anyone doing these calculations, and if so, what exit flow, movement speed, and reaction time would you consider appropriate for spaces using these systems?

​Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Jesse
4/9/2025 09:18:38 am

I have to preface my response with these comments are mine, and I'm not speaking for the NFPA 2001 technical committee, etc etc etc.

The annex references SFPE Handbook 5th edition. The ASET time is how much time is available to make a safe egress and we balance that with the RSET, which is the required time element to make a safe egress. For reasons that are probably obvious, the ASET neds to be less than the RSET.

While the SFPE Handbook gives a few iodeas of how we can find the ASET, in my humble opinion an actual egress study works fine and is allowed by the standard. This would be normal occupant load for the space, and simply timing how long it takes the occupants to move to a safe area.

Its not unlike how the FAA measures how long it takes to evacuate an airplane.And we expect occupants to leave their belongings (if any) and just get out.

One advantage is that the people working in this area are highly likely to be intimately familiar with the layout and the means of egress.

If the ASET Value is less than the RSET Value, all is well. If the ASET is equal to or higher than the RSET, we need to improve routes of egress.

Hope this helps

Reply
Joe
4/9/2025 10:52:09 am

Several factors must be reviewed to complete the time egress study this including the
following items:
Agent type and design concentration
Occupant load
Exit Routes
Exit Availability
Exit Width
Travel Distance
Evacuation Time Factors
Reaction Time
Movement Time
Exit Flow

Evacuation time = Rection time + Movement time + Exit time

reaction time for occupants to perceive the alarm and begin
evacuation is typically assumed to be around 30 to 60 seconds under normal conditions may be higher.

Movement time = {travel distance to exit ÷ travelspeed} × (number of occupants) When reviewing travel speed, what about people that are in a wheel chair or other factor


Exit time = number of exits ÷ (flow rate × width of exit)

Reply
Chris Nelson
4/11/2025 08:30:45 am

This is backwards. RSET should be less than ASET.

The required time should less than available time. If the required time is more than the available time, people are dead.

Reply
Chad
4/9/2025 11:32:46 am

Are there rooms that are large enough where RSET would ever be greater than 3 or 5 minutes where there is an agent system? I am looking for an example so I can wrap my brain around why you would need to perform the calc?

Given that the space will always have A/V notification devices so reaction time would never be more than 10 seconds or so?

I guess I could see a performance based design that might need that but prescriptive?

Reply
Joe
4/9/2025 01:20:46 pm

Data center and other spaces like them can take that long.

Please look as SFPE handbook and NFPA handbook, they tell us to use a reaction time at minimum 30-69 second under normal conditions.

The travel speed for can be around 3 feet per second on flat ground and even lower if there are mobility occupants. ( wheelchair, walkers and other issues)

I would be afraid to use a number that is faster then the handbooks talks about.

Reply
Ricardo Gonzales Jr
4/9/2025 03:13:54 pm

When looking at the concentrations, be sure not to confuse the agent concentration with O2 concentration. O2 is maxed out at 20.6% at sea level and holds fairly well as elevation increases. It's agent concentration that changes as air pressure is lessened. i.e. at sea level the O2 pressure is 14.7psi, but at 6,000 feet the pressure drops to 11.8psi. O2 is still 20.6% makeup but of only 11.8 psi. Takes less agent to get the same % of concentration in the room. When atmosphere pressure gets below a certain point, our bodies no longer can absorb O2 out of the air. It's the agent exposure that is of concern.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT