|
Does a panoramic or free-standing elevator have to be in a fire-rated shaft if it's not penetrating a floor assembly?
IBC 3002.1 requires shaft enclosures per Sections 712 and 713 and opening protections for the shaft, but in this photo example of an elevator in an open atrium, I wouldn't think it's penetrating a floor slab, so it would be required to be in a shaft. I believe that the wall facing the floor would need to be rated accordingly, but not the rest of the shaft. I'm pretty sure this makes sense, but I don't see any code language that would explicitly say this is right. Thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Todd E Wyatt
10/20/2025 08:16:43 am
No. Elevator hoistways in compliant Atriums per the scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024 Section 404 Atriums.) are not req'd to be fire-resistance rated.
Reply
Jesse
10/20/2025 08:18:22 am
No, this isn't required to have a fire-rated shaft
Reply
Glenn Berger
10/20/2025 08:51:27 am
The elevator in question does not need to be in a rated enclosure. The elevator does not penetrate any rated floors. Todd provided a valid reference that might be applicable to your project.
Reply
Jack G
10/20/2025 09:31:54 am
While the shaft does not require protection ,the doors on the floor side require smoke and fire protection.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
10/20/2025 09:50:06 am
I recommend they review the following as the req'd 1-Hr Fire Barrier (1FB) enclosure of the Atrium includes multiple exceptions :
Reply
Jeff
10/20/2025 01:26:50 pm
All 3 levels are open to all 4 sides. Why would you protect the doors from smoke or fire as it is completely open and unobstructed around the shaft?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Nov '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2025
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
