MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Does Each Building Need Own Isolation Valve?

8/9/2024

11 Comments

 
If I have a fire tap that services multiple buildings, is it required to have a service valve outside the building on each line?

Does each building need to be capable of being isolated in case of service needs without interrupting others?

As it is, if one building needs work done to the #1 valve on the backflow then the other buildings will have to lose water during repair.

Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Chad
8/9/2024 07:34:05 am

I cannot imagine an insurance company would allow one shutoff for multiple buildings, unless it was a small out building like a small shed or similar. Nor I as an AHJ would under the guise of a reasonable degree of safety.

2019 NFPA 24 requires a valve, it does not say it wont affect other buildings but I would interpret it as that its for just one buildings based on 6.6

6.2 Connections to Water Supplies.
6.2.1 A valve in accordance with Section 6.1 shall be installed
in each pipeline from each water supply.


6.6 Sectional Valves.
6.6.1* Sectional valves shall be provided at appropriate locations
within piping sections such that the number of fire
protection connections between sectional valves does not
exceed six.
6.6.2 A sectional valve shall be provided at the following locations:
(1) On each bank of a river, pond, or lake where a main
crosses water
(2) Outside the building foundation(s) where a main or a
section of a main is installed under a building

Reply
Glenn Berger
8/9/2024 08:11:17 am

The word used in the question is "required." No where in the question is the building size or configuration is mentioned.

In general I do agree with Chad's statements.

Reply
Franck
8/9/2024 08:47:51 am

I will speak from the loss prevention side for Insurance companies (my job), not from standard or building code.

As indicated above, if you are speaking of 3 low value small buildings, no problem for one valve for all of them.
If you are speaking of high value buildings (in terms of money or critical aspects), it makes sense to have multiple systems with multiple valves.
No insurance company will be happy with an impairment on several buildings because you need maintenance/repair on one of them.
If you have 4 buildings, it means four more chances to have all buildings impacted at the same time.
So not a desirable situation.

Reply
Jesse
8/9/2024 09:03:14 am

Agree with Franck. I worked in loss control for a long time. If these buildings have any substantive value, the insurer won't like impairing all at the same time.

Reply
Pete H
8/9/2024 09:17:49 am

Agree with Chad, Franck, Glenn, and Jesse.

It doesn't seem to be required by code.... but it does seem to be a really good idea.

Especially if these buildings are insured in any capacity.

Reply
Matthew
8/9/2024 09:41:49 am

I'm not entirely clear on the site water distribution layout based on the description, but just to expand on Chad's comment, NFPA 24 (2019) section 6.1.1 outlines the requirements for control valves on water supplies. There are multiple acceptable configurations - some involving exterior valves and others interior to the building.

6.1 Valves.

6.1.1
All valves controlling connections to water supplies and to supply pipes to water-based fire protection systems shall be listed indicating valves, except as permitted by 6.1.1.3 and 6.1.1.4.

6.1.1.1
A listed underground gate valve equipped with a listed indicator post shall be permitted.

6.1.1.2
A listed water control valve assembly with a position indication connected to a remote supervisory station shall be permitted.

6.1.1.3*
A listed, nonindicating valve, such as an underground gate valve, including a T-wrench, shall be permitted to be installed in a roadway box when acceptable to the AHJ.

6.1.1.3.1
For new installations, where more than one nonindicating underground gate valve is installed in a water system, all underground gate valves shall be of the same opening direction.

6.1.1.4*
A new connection to a municipal water supply shall be permitted to utilize a nonlisted, nonindicating valve, including a T-wrench as part of a tapping assembly.

6.1.1.4.1
For new installations, where more than one nonindicating underground gate valve is installed in a water system, all underground gate valves shall be of the same opening direction.

Reply
Matthew
8/9/2024 09:45:08 am

I actually grabbed the wrong reference in my previous post. NFPA 24 (2019) 6.2.9 was the section I was intending to share:

6.2.9
All connections to private fire service mains for fire protection systems shall be arranged in accordance with one of the following so that they can be isolated:

(1)* A post indicator valve installed not less than 40 ft (12 m) from the building

(a) For buildings less than 40 ft (12 m) in height, a post indicator valve shall be permitted to be installed closer than 40 ft (12 m) but at least as far from the building as the height of the wall facing the post indicator valve.

(2) A wall post indicator valve

(3) An indicating valve in a pit, installed in accordance with Section 6.4

(4)* A backflow preventer with at least one indicating valve not less than 40 ft (12 m) from the building

(a) For buildings less than 40 ft (12 m) in height, a backflow preventer with at least one indicating valve shall be permitted to be installed closer than 40 ft (12 m) but at least as far from the building as the height of the wall facing the backflow preventer.

(5)* A nonindicating valve, such as an underground gate valve with an approved roadway box, complete with T-wrench, located not less than 40 ft (12 m) from the building

(a) For buildings less than 40 ft (12 m) in height, a nonindicating valve, such as an underground gate valve with an approved roadway box, complete with T-wrench, shall be permitted to be installed closer than 40 ft (12 m) but at least as far from the building as the height of the wall facing the non-indicating valve.

(6) Control valves installed in a fire-rated room accessible from the exterior

(7) Control valves in a fire-rated stair enclosure accessible from the exterior as permitted by the AHJ

Reply
Jack G
8/9/2024 11:06:27 am

In the 3 states i work in a separate service is required for each address by city/ state/ county.

Reply
Jack G
8/9/2024 01:41:21 pm

Also, buildings with multiple condos or townhomes, apartments are permitted to have one entry to the building, but then it is broken up to the multiple addresses with their own water meter, bfp, and individual supplies to each unit.

Reply
Jimmy
8/12/2024 05:17:23 am

This question should have been addressed during the permitting process and installation.
If you are working on an existing system or a new one, it is wise to ask the AHJ.

Because when the/a system needs to be shut down by the fire dept. you can bet the valve locations will be addressed then.

Typically, each building or floor should have its own control valve.
This is common practice and common sense.

Reply
Redouane
8/14/2024 12:04:57 pm

Agree with Chad

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Oct '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT