MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About
Picture
A FORUM FOR FIRE PROTECTION QUESTIONS & PE EXAM PROBLEMS | SUBSCRIBE NOW

Do Other Consultants Review Site Utility Plans?

12/30/2020

10 Comments

 
I've been seven years in the chair, and the most thankless job I encounter on every project is - reviewing the site utility plan and picking it apart.

I've now made my own rule that I will only point the civil engineer's mistakes once, early in the project, and when it comes time to stack the riser, pressure test, etc, all I can say is "I pointed that out to you on Aug 11 2020 email."

Am I going about this the wrong way? SHould I even be investing energy into correcting the engineer with the stamp?

Recent example is a two story building with concrete tees. We're adding third and fourth floors from new structural members. The underground man took the site utility and started digging. Check valve was exposed above ground (supposed to be in pit) and the FDC was connected to the underground on the system side of the backflow preventer. Now he has to dig it up, cap the tee after the backflow preventer, and run it around and inside the building. The job requires a small pump (CL1 manual wet standpipe), and the underground man wasn't happy. All I was doing was point out wrong installations before it was too late.

I'm always left thinking, "this isn't even in my scope of work, but it affects everything downstream."

​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Michael Ruck
12/30/2020 09:13:51 am

You do what is right to protect the public health and safety. It's the number 1 responsibility of an engineer.

You are all on the same design team. Note the errors in a field report. The owner reads those reports. He'll appreciate the fact that it was caught before it became a bigger problem.

Reply
Alex Jenness
12/30/2020 09:18:28 am

Agreed. Projects are a team sport. While you're not expected to hand-hold someone else's scope we're all responsible to point out errors we see. It's all intertwined. The civil affects my work, my work affects the structural, and on and on.

I've also learned that we're all fallible. A stamp or a certification doesn't mean you won't miss something. What's important is that errors are caught, fixed and we learn from what we can.

Reply
Jose Cruz
12/30/2020 12:15:34 pm

What you did is a good engineering practice, at the start up of a project that includes FPS, I use to call a meeting with other trades contractors, trying to make them aware of the rules at the least of NFPA, regarding, mainly obstructions, underground pipe depth, an so on.

Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
12/30/2020 09:24:21 am

100% agree with Michael. I appreciate comments on my designs (hvac, fire protection, and plumbing) from any team member whether they're in the field or at the desk. I usually end up learning something new or adding a new item to a design checklist.

Yes, it can be exhausting to repeat yourself. At the end of the day, your client (and their budget) will appreciate it, and usually the person on the other end will to.

Reply
Glenn Berger
12/30/2020 09:43:33 am

Teamwork and documentation!

Do not get complacent.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
12/30/2020 10:18:14 am

Great comments. Definitely takes a team. These type of mistakes are fairly common where we are and as a sprinkler contractor, we usually end up being the last line of defense, whether we are doing the underground or not. Curious if your area has a requirement for the fire line to be installed by a licensed fire sprinkler contractor. That has helped to alleviate some of the issues in our area. FDC locations seem so simple to us because we understand the purpose of them, unfortunately it's like black magic to a lot of the site utility contractors. They think that we just make up the location as we go along. Keep educating everyone and fighting the good fight. All you can do.

Reply
HJ
12/30/2020 11:24:26 am

Yes, you should look at the civil plans.

To clarify, the FDC must be on the sprinkler system side of the backflow preventer. There can be no shutoff valve between the FDC and the riser. Not sure if that is what you meant.

Reply
Pete D.
12/30/2020 03:26:51 pm

The A&E firm or Architect of record, whoever submits the package to planning, should allow time for interdisciplinary review. Many states, such as TX and TN require that the UG sprinkler work be done by a licensed sprinkler company, that is, no Joe the plumber. If that is the case, there will be a FP sheet for underground sprinkler pipe, and I insist that my design is mirrored on the civil site utility plan. It has to be coordinated for clearance to high voltage, etc.

Reply
Tony Brownanthonycert@yahoo.
1/2/2021 08:31:10 pm

I always review Site Plans and Mech. plans to make sure that I won't have unforseen "gotchas" down the road. I also make it my policy that i will size the Fire Sprinkler service. Last Project that I am working on was asked to submit a letter as to why the Project couldn't have just one service especially seeing the the big name NYCEngineering Firm (I'm a tiny mname firm, there are three of us) had down a 3/4" service for both fire and domestic. The Project is a 4 story (Cellar and three floors) residence with a portable design flow of 180 gpm. That was a fun letter I wrote...

Reply
Mike M
1/3/2021 09:23:58 pm

Great Responses!

When do we stop doing the QA/QC for an engineering / architectural firm? Is that our job? I have been a fire marshal for over 12 years and I recently asked a licensed architect why I am teaching the code, and doing quality control work for a person that makes 200 more dollars an hour than I do. He replied that most of the mistakes come from the 12 dollar an hour intern or drafts person, not the architect. I am not sure this is true, and I am also not sure I should except this type of business model. I rely on my third party consultants to help get the construction documents in line. They are a valuable asset to have, so as a building official...THANK YOU! for checking those civil sheets.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jump to: Daily Posts
    Jump to: PE Problems
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    Free Signup

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    Community

    Thank You to Our Top
    ​October '20 Contributors!
    1. SK
    2. Franck
    3. Dan W.
    4. Jonathan ​5. Casey M.
    6. Sean
    7. Colin L.
    8. Mike
    9. Jonathan J
    ​10. Daniel G.


    Your Post

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    The Toolkit

    Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
    ​
    ​Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
    Picture
    FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    Filters

    All
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    IFC
    Information Sources For Analysis
    IRC
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 12
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management Systems
    Special Hazard Systems
    Types Of Analysis
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015


    Daily
    Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    Exam Prep

    Picture
    2020 PE Prep Guide​
    ​(Available Now!)
    Picture
    PE Prep Series
    ​(Available Now!)
    2020 PE Prep Series
    Current Leaderboard
    ​(Click to enlarge)
    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep

    PE Problems
    ​Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

    Solutions are posted the day after posting.

    Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

    Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

    RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store
Picture
Copyright © 2020 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About