Our facility is exploring constructing two large (7,200 ft²) facilities for media blasting and coating large steel structures.
The facilities have a ceiling height of approximately 40' and are enclosed via a large roll-up door on one end. The coating systems are categorized as flammable liquids. There has been some internal debate on how to categorize these per the IFC - as "spray rooms," which would require fire suppression, or "spraying spaces," which the IFC does not have a prescriptive requirement for fire suppression. The commentary in the IFC notes that spraying spaces are typically "unenclosed", leading us to lean towards considering these spray rooms, even though they make up the entirety of the building versus a portion of it. We've reached out to some of the local AHJs, who all seem to agree with the spray room determination. However, the builder of the structures has indicated that most of their installations have not required suppression, even when reviewed by the local AHJ. Is categorizing these structures as "spray rooms" the wrong application of the term? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Chad
2/7/2025 08:15:24 am
Those are spray rooms, IMHO as an AHJ.
Reply
Connor R
2/7/2025 08:39:04 am
Looking at the IBC and IFC commentary, in spraying spaces the requirement for a fire suppression system comes down to the occupancy classification of the space. If the MAQ is exceeded (most likely considering these are for coating large steel structures) then the area is classified as an H occupancy and must be sprinklered.
Reply
Connor R
2/7/2025 08:41:50 am
Also notice that "The fire code official is authorized to define the limits of the spraying space in any specific case."
Reply
Pete H
2/7/2025 11:09:04 am
I agree, I'd go towards spray rooms. Especially if the local AHJ's agreed for spray rooms. Cause then it no longer matters if other AHJ's in other jurisdictions let it be considered a spray area, the one that has jurisdiction where relevant said spray rooms.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
2/7/2025 11:11:00 am
If the Hazardous Materials (HM) can be managed with Control Areas (CA) to meet the Maximum Allowable Quantities (MAQ) to meet an Occupancy Classification (OC) of Group F Factory instead of Group H Hazardous, the requirement for an Automatic Sprinkler System (ASPS) will be determined by the scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2021) per 903.2.4 Group F-1 #1-#3 (see REFERENCES below).
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Feb '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
March 2025
PE PREP SERIES |