MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Difference Between CMDA & CMSA Sprinklers?

5/17/2021

7 Comments

 
What is the difference between a K17 (CMDA upright) and Ultra K17 (CMSA) sprinkler?

When I look for the technical data sheet, I don't see any specific difference except the color of the cover of these Tyco sprinklers (bronze for CMDA and Chrome for CMSA).

Does anyone know if these sprinklers are the same, except the fact that they work at different pressures?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
Justin Harrison
5/17/2021 08:43:53 am

I know we used to use the Ultra K17's when we were doing Quell systems alot, they're great for rack storage of Group A plastics. Not sure if those are specific to that type of Pre-action system but i've never used them for anything except the above or hear of anyone being able to. Might be made specifically for those systems but not sure.

Reply
Brian Gerdwagen
5/17/2021 08:59:02 am

The Ultras are a specific application sprinkler. The data sheet used to list those specific applications of storage and building height.

The physical difference is a different SIN, a chrome deflector, and 300% cost increase compared to the K17-231.

Reply
Heriberto Urbina
5/17/2021 08:59:22 am

CMDA sprinklers refer to a specific type of sprinkler listed for control of fires in storage applications and CMSA sprinklers refer to a specific type of sprinkler listed for storage applications with increased severity fires.

The primary difference between CMSA and CMDA sprinklers is that the former create a larger water droplet, which allows greater penetration of the high-energy fire plume and increased fire control performance.

Reply
CJ Bonczyk
5/17/2021 09:05:02 am

While the sprinkler may look very similar in nature a large difference is in what the sprinkler has been specifically tested and manufactured for the building occupancy and what its protecting. Manufacturers will pay UL & FM large amounts of money to test various sprinklers based on a specific fire test at laboratories. Ultra K17 carries a listing as a CMSA style sprinkler that can only be used as outlined per NFPA 13 and the same goes for the CMDA sprinkler. A CMSA has specific application listings to be used on higher challenge fires due to its large water droplet output & size (i.e. used in Quell Cold Storage facilities). They are normally used for storage/warehousing applications, that are typically viewed as a hybrid system between the standard CMDA and the ESFR system but are more expensive. CMSA's allow for protection of commodities in buildings with higher ceilings without (in most cases) the need for in-rack sprinklers. Where as CMDA listed sprinklers require in-racks and the density areas increase. Personally I avoid the use of CMSA if CMDA is out of the question and lean to an ESFR system if possible as the advantages are better.

Reply
matt
5/17/2021 09:08:08 am

the heads will have different design approaches if you use NFPA 13 criteria.

If there is no specific data on the listing sheet, then select one from NFPA 13 for CMSA. They typically have a gpm-per-head criteria for a certain number of heads.

CMDA is the gpm per sqft for a certain area approach. Also outlined in NFPA 13.

The heads may appear very similar, but the discharge and protection criteria can be very different.

Reply
Cezary Szkuc
3/23/2022 06:25:13 am

Great discussion...

I am estimating a project where a wall is being relocated going into an area where CMSA sprinkler heads are installed. on the other side of the wall CMDA sprinkler heads are currently there. I am questioning to myself if mixing of CMSA and CMDA sprinkler heads is permit but i think if both sprinkler heads are SR i should be fine. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Reply
انس عبدالحميد محمود ابراهيم راضي
7/15/2023 05:33:34 am

CMSA : K FACTOR=19
CMDA: K FACTOR=12

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT