|
I am performing a design on an existing system that was 3% AFFF and we are converting it to 3x3 NFF. Bladders, proportioners, concentrate lines are being replaced and all sprinklers being replaced to meet the specification for the new concentrate.
In the spec it has been requested to utilize the "water equivalency test method," which is outlined in NFPA 11. I've performed installs, inspections of foam systems for 10+ years, I've never seen this method installed and not very versed in how it really works, only from what I've read. There's not much information out there. Have you used this method? What have the requirements been for testing this method? Were you given outside specifications? Does any additional information exist for detail? I'm wanting to be sure we're compliant from a design and install perspective. I'm following the diagram supplied in NFPA 11-2016. "D.5.2.3 Water Equivalency Method. In this approach, water issued as a surrogate liquid in place of foam concentrate. The initial acceptance test(s) are conducted with the actual foam concentrate using equipment similar to that shown in Figures Figure D.5.2.2(b) and Figure D.5.2.2(c): real-time pressure, flow, and conductivity measurements are recorded with the actual foam concentrate to determine that the system is pro-portioning accurately. Immediately following this test, a water equivalency test at the exact same pressure and flows as in the initial foam discharge test is performed after isolating the foam concentrate tank. Example test setups are shown in Figures Figure D.5.2.3(a) and Figure D.5.2.3(b). This provides a baseline for comparison using water only for follow-on routine inspections and tests." Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
1 Comment
BK
9/19/2025 01:03:17 pm
I may not have much to add to this one. I have similar experience as you and have not seen this come up in foam systems. First I would have to lean on one or more foam providers. They will have solutions for this. It reads to me like you do a standard test via test outlet to confirm foam proportioning plotted on a chart as many of us have done. After that, the test is repeated without foam. Water only pressures/flows are recorded as the baseline for annual and five year testing. I suppose this allows you to test flow rates and not utilize foam. HOWEVER: NFPA 11:D.5.2.3 (2021) goes on to state that the equivalency test is appropriate for AFFF but NOT viscous foam concentrates similar to AR-AFFF. This to me sounds like a red flag, as I believe NFF is quite viscous. Therefore, on its face, the spec may be inappropriate to request this. This is quite interesting and confusing. Wish I could help further.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Nov '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2025
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
