I am working on a design for a wet sprinkler system in an industrial oven. This oven has steel mandrils with fiberglass strands coated in epoxy rolled through them, heated to 350 degrees. Then, they are rolled through another machine that blows ambient-temperature air onto the mandrils to cool them down. This process forms fiberglass/epoxy-reinforced conduits. There are (3) total exhaust ducts, one penetrating the roof and two extending 5'-0" above the top of the machine and into the open building. No dipping, flow coating, or spraying happens in this machine. Strictly heating and cooling. I am guided by NFPA 13's rules on ducts, but I don't believe NFPA 33's design criteria would apply here. I am also guided to NFPA 13 2022 9.3.8 and A9.3.8, but I am unclear on whether 15 psi is required at each head based on the wording. My thinking is that a 0.2 over the whole oven would be the design criteria, protecting the hazard (OH2) in a non-FM building. What would your design criteria for this be?
Would you calculate the heads in the exhaust ducts? Would you put heads in the exhaust ducts that don't extend through the roof or say they're protected by the overhead system? I have my thoughts, but a lot is left up to interpretation. Thank you for any information. P.S. in the attached file, (2) ducts that don't extend through the roof are shown as actually extending through the roof. There is a revision drawing I am waiting on. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
Peter Howard
8/6/2024 07:43:00 am
I think you might be in NFPA 86.
Reply
Glenn Berger
8/6/2024 08:24:18 am
Peter's answer above contains the correct path forward. Typically ovens will have fire protection installed from the mfg.
Reply
Chris
8/6/2024 08:44:05 am
I have encountered an Oven before, but it has been a long time. We had started with a dry system in the oven. The piping left the oven, ran about 20' over, and hit the DPV. We kept having tons of issues with the oven heating the air and causing unexpected over-pressurization. It was a really interesting and crazy experience... The DPV kept tripping and we couldn't figure out why? Our best guess is that the clapper got so hot that it was boiling the water on the other side, causing it to vaporize and turn into gas and dramatically increasing the pressure to the point that it tripped the valve.
Reply
Dan Wilder
8/6/2024 10:55:54 am
With doing a similar oven for a private defense MFG creating carbon reinforced seats and helmets for aircraft, we omitted wet sprinkler protection in lieu of a dry chem within the oven due to the potential steam discharge potential (within a closed/sealed oven) and that life safety hazard to the surrounding area. The ducting was protected with a dry sprinkler system using quartzoid sprinklers. In this case with the ducting exhausting into the interior, I would still put in sprinklers for any duct between the oven and the fans at a minimum.
Reply
Jack G
8/6/2024 03:54:53 pm
Mfpa 86 requirements for industrial ovens and furnaces.
Reply
Jesse
8/6/2024 04:57:12 pm
Oh man I love questions like this one. Really gets me back to my HPR roots.
Reply
David Williams
8/8/2024 04:54:53 pm
That's funny... back when I was a plant engineer, I designed an oven to incinerate the debris left on screens that create the screen pattern on the back of hardboard. (the process eliminated a dangerous boiler chemical dip process). 900 degree F.. electric elements every 6 inches to cover the 5' x 16' screens. So we were an incinerator and expected to have fire in there (although the amount of wood fiber that we were burning off was only enough to sort of smolder... we never thought about sprinklers or fire protection although the building it was in (hardboard mill) certainly had protection. Is it all NFPA 86?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop June '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
July 2025
PE PREP SERIES |