MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Commodity Classification for Fruit in Plastic Bins?

2/27/2025

9 Comments

 
What is the NFPA Commodity Classification for fruit in plastic bins (for example, cherries, floor-stacked 20 ft. high)?

The bins are open on top with holes for drainage and are full of cherries.

Do the bins make this Class I a Class IV or Group A plastic instead?
Picture
Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Pete H
2/27/2025 06:33:46 am

For me it depends on whether the fruits are dried or not. These do not look like dried fruits, and the plastic is not an empty container.

That said, if they store extra plastic empty containers inside the facility, I'd say that immediately gets this up to either a Class IV or Group A, depending on the type of plastic container. If it is PET, Class IV. If not, group A expanded.

If the fruits are dried, I'd say they still go into "dry foods", this becomes a Class III, and with the plastic tray, though not a pallet, I'd still err on the side of caution and say group A. And expanded Group A based on the size of the plastic.

If the fruits are not dry, and the container is larger than five gallons (looks like), Class I commodity kicked up two levels for the plastic container, Class III.

Best case that I could argue for is Class III. Worst case is Group A Expanded.

Reply
Jesse
2/27/2025 08:17:26 am

Packaging must alwats be considered and is more frequently driving the overall commodity class.

The type of plastic matters, and I must disagree with Pete here. That doesn't look like expanded Group A. Expanded has micro-air pockets within the material - think foam materials.

There are bound to be idle crates throughout. I surveyed a bunch of facilties using these in Central CA and the Texas RGV as well as the PNW. We treated them as Group A Plastic.

Reply
Pete H
2/27/2025 11:33:57 am

I was claiming expanded due to:

Table A.5.6.4.1 Examples of Group A Plastic Commodities:

Empty Containers -
Rigid Plastic (not including PET), up to 32 oz (1 L) - Nonexpanded
Rigid Plastic (not including PET), greater than 32 oz - Expanded.

---

It looks larger than 32 ounces.

But I do agree that it's also probably not an expanded group a plastic because it is very likely made with PET. I just can't state that with certainty.

Reply
Glenn Berger
2/27/2025 08:30:32 am

Group A Plastic - The storage container has been typically the driver for the commodity type on my projects.

Reply
Jose Figueroa
2/27/2025 08:31:33 am

It depends! I recommend checking out this reading: https://www.nfpa.org/news-blogs-and-articles/blogs/2022/01/18/commodity-classifications-in-nfpa-13.

I have visited several cold warehouses in Texas and have consistently classified them as non-expanded Class A plastics. These trays can be stored at heights of over 10 meters on racks. Water from the sprinkler system can pass through, but the only thing that the fire can detect is plastic.

Reply
Mike Dacey link
2/27/2025 08:52:12 am

This is a tough on. The container looks closer to a solid unit than gridded. Also failry substaintail. A case could be made for unexpanded, exposed Group A plastics. The sprinkler design would also cover the empties.

Reply
NK
2/27/2025 08:55:52 am

1) The protection criterias have changed in the newer editions of NFPA 13, but I don't think the commodity classifications themselves have changed much. NFPA 13, 2025 has improved definitions and organization for storage that I'd recommending reading. I'd start with these definitions:
§3.3.40 Commodity.
§3.3.73 Expanded (Foamed or Cellular) Plastics.
§3.3.74 Exposed Group A Plastic Commodities.

2) Next I'd read NFPA 13, 2025 for commodity classification definitions (the actual definitions, not just the examples). The answer to your question is going to be based on the classification you come up with so §20.4.5 (which type of material the container is), the classification of the fruit (see the examples of commodities in the Annex), and Figure 20.4.3.3(b) Exposed Commodities Containing a Mixture of Expanded and Nonexpanded Group A Plastics need to be explored.

3) Group C plastics are protected as Class III and Group B plastics are protected as Class IV (see Figure 20.4.8) so knowing the type of plastic is pretty important here (especially at that height). A quick google search shows that most fruit containers are PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) or PP (Polypropylene), but it's worth asking the client.

4) If the container is an exposed non-expanded group A plastic and the commodity inside is a class III commodity then Figure 20.4.3.3(b) is going to tell you how to protect it based on the weight and volume.

5) Exposed non-expanded group A plastic looks like it's probably your answer, but understanding how to ask the right questions, read the right sections, and communicate why you're choosing this design criteria is key.

6) After the commodity is determined you can look at method of storage to see what options NFPA 13 provides.

Good luck out there.

Reply
Jack G
2/27/2025 02:08:30 pm

For me,changing wood crates for plastic ones , for storing fresh fruit , if the storage arrangement was solid pile ,to 20 ft—- maybe building height 30 ft , I d find that the density for a stable pile was. 1.1 gpm. / ft2.
If the pile was considered unstable then the density would drop to. .6 gpm. / ft2.
Such a difference has a rather significant difference on cost / / /. whether a fire pump/ city supply or a fire pump / tank supply.
There are 2 basic groups of modifiers : those that change the commode classification and : those that impact the design basis.
From a fire dynamics perspective, the cc( comedy classification) is the amount of heat that is released from the material itself along with the form it takes ( surface area to mass ratio)
The variables impacting the design basis ( density, remote area)
assigned to a specific commodity.
Basically we have 8 commodity classifications made up of commodity’s 1-4, and a family of group A plastics set into 4 groups.
Chemical additives may also be a modifying factor with fresh fruit.
I would treat this as a commodity classification / and apply how it is packaged, shrink wrap— vs encapsulated, and treat the pallets/ packaging as a class A plastic-expanded.
The densities , depending on how it’s stored to 20 ft could range the density could range from a .153, to a .34, to a .6.
Just follow the charts and pick your poisons. Consult the engineer of record and your FPE. A lot of these specs are driven by manufacturers that want to sell an expensive sprinkler head. Opinion.

Reply
Richard Stehr
2/27/2025 02:35:29 pm

Refer to 2021 International Fire Code Chapter 32 -Figure 3203.9(2).

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 3-601-02
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT