|
A 40,000 sqft, F-2 Occupancy, single-story metalworking facility of IBC Type II-B construction is not required to be provided with automatic sprinkler protection due to the lack of sufficient combustible loading in the IBC.
However, the same 40,000 sqft single-story facility of IBC Type II-B construction of a Mercantile (M) occupancy must be provided with automatic sprinkler protection due to sufficient combustible loading to warrant sprinkler protection. Unfortunately, IFC Appendix B does not distinguish between these different occupancies with regard to Fire Flow except that a 75% reduction is offered to the M occupancy for sprinkler protection. Since no sprinkler protection is required for the F-2 occupancy, can't it be treated the same as occupancies requiring sprinkler protection and provided with sprinkler protection - allowing for the 75% reduction? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments
C
12/10/2024 08:27:06 am
I recommend taking a look at the allowable height and areas table in the IBC. For a type IIB, non-sprinklered F-2 occupancy, the maximum allowable area is 23,000sf (IBC table 506.2). Unless there is more to the story, then the building is required to have an automatic sprinkler system or be split with a 2hr rated fire assembly per the IBC to have fire areas less than 23,000sf.
Reply
Richard Stehr
12/10/2024 09:57:20 am
The building in this case is surrounded by more than 60 ft.
Reply
J.H.
12/10/2024 10:49:02 am
Check the Conflicts provisions in the IBC and IFC (make sure those are the adopted Codes in effect); the more stringent requirement will generally apply.
J.H.
12/10/2024 08:33:59 am
What part of the world is your project located? Are IBC and IFC the locally adopted Codes?
Reply
Jesse
12/10/2024 08:41:57 am
I'm also curious as tot where this is and what the applicable governing code is. The sq. footage would trigger an AS requirement in my neck of the woods, unless doing so would potentially increase the loss portentials (i.e. a foundry).
Reply
Chris Nelson
12/10/2024 11:28:19 am
Its a typo "I also curious as to where"
Nic J
12/10/2024 09:08:43 am
I do not interpret that a reduction in fire flow would be permitted in this case. In the IFC Appendix B (2024 ed.) table B105.2 lists out reductions for sprinkler protection but does not delineate between any occupancy group. In my opinion you need to provide the full fire flow per B105.1(2) for the 40,000 SF Type II-B building. 4,250 GPM for 4 hours.
Reply
Jack G
12/10/2024 09:17:25 am
I think in most of The USA sprinkler system would be required per the sq footage. If it is not being protected with sprinklers then you cannot mess with fire flow. Review the extinguisher requirements also. Beverages with 12% alcohol are an F-2 classification, beer and wines.
Reply
Glenn Berger
12/10/2024 09:39:13 am
The reduction factor in fire flow requirement for a building provided with automatic sprinkler system(s) cannot be applied to an unsprinklered building.
Reply
Jose R Figueroa
12/10/2024 09:51:32 am
Thank you! I still have some questions about this project and would love to gain a clearer understanding.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/11/2024 03:59:31 am
“A 40,000 sqft, F-2 Occupancy, single-story metalworking facility of IBC Type II-B construction is not required to be provided with automatic sprinkler protection due to …” the following IBC section (2024 used in this example) :
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/11/2024 04:00:04 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Dec '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
February 2026
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
