Per NFPA 25 there needs to be a hydrostatic test of fire department connection pipe every 5 years. It does specify pipe material that are exempt (CPVC).
Should I recommend a hydrostatic test of the 2-inch FDC feed if the pipe is walled in and connected to the CPVCc before and after the check valve? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Pete H
6/4/2024 07:23:57 am
As per NFPA 25 (2023)
Reply
Glenn Berger
6/4/2024 08:22:01 am
I looked at the 2 previous versions and did not come across the CPVC exception.
Reply
Anthony
6/4/2024 08:42:00 am
More testing is better than less testing. It's also a billable item so go get paid for the work.
Reply
Matthew Mueller
6/4/2024 08:51:28 am
Pete H. is spot on. There is no exemption for hydro testing due to pipe material. There may be confusion as to the internal assessment of the pipe as non-metalic pipe does not require internal assessment. Chapter 14 goes on to state: 14.2.1.5 Nonmetallic pipe shall not be required to comply with Section 14.2.
Reply
Pete H
6/4/2024 08:58:42 am
Thank you, Matt.
Reply
Jack G
6/4/2024 11:32:24 am
The “ functionality test” —hydro as explained above is for preventive maintenance of the system.
Reply
6/4/2024 01:34:07 pm
25 has the hydro-testing requirements and I'm not familiar with an exemption for CPVC.
Reply
Dominic Colletti
6/7/2024 08:29:36 am
I agree that there is no exemption for the hydro test for CPVC.
Reply
Randy Kimbro
6/10/2024 02:17:54 pm
As a fire inspector AHJ, our firefighters are going to pump into that FDC at least at 150psi. So common sense says it should be hydro tested no matter what the piping material is made of. I also know of no exception for CPVC FDC's.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop January '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
February 2025
PE PREP SERIES |